Communication Instructions for Reaching Patent Attorney Ventre

The Law Firm of

Louis Ventre, Jr.

Registered Patent Attorney

BOUND NOTEBOOK PRACTICES

Add Site to Favorites

Useful Links from Patent Attorney Ventre

Back to Frequently Asked Questions

 

 
Patent
Application
  1. UTILITY
-Business Method
-Software
-Drug
  2. DESIGN
  3. PLANT
  4. PROVISIONAL
  5. PCT
Patent
Infringement
Opinions
Designing
Around
Patents
Patent
Reexamination
Patent
Reissue
Patent
Infringement
Damages
Patent
Licensing
Foreign Filing
License &
Non-U.S. Filers
 
Invention
Marketing
Invention
Opportunities
Invention
Notebook
Who Is An
Inventor
 
Trademark
Application
Trademark
Cancellation
Trademark
Infringement
International
Trademark
 
Copyright
Application
Copyright Infringement
 
Trade
Secrets
Employment
Secrecy
Agreement
 
Cooperative
R&D
Agreement
 
Pay by
Charge Card
 
Attorney Contact
Information
Attorney
Biography
Proximity to
Patent Office
 
Links
Frequently
Asked
Questions
Tax
Considerations
 
Website Index
Website Use
Disclaimer

NOTEBOOK TO DOCUMENT WHEN AN INVENTION IS MADE

patent%20attorney%20star Why Keep a Notebook.  United States patents are issuable to the first to invent, not the first to file for a patent.  On the other hand, most foreign patent offices issue patents to the first to file for a patent.   So, in the United States, keeping a lab notebook can be a key piece of evidence in helping to decide who was first to invent and therefore who deserves the patent, among two or more competing inventors who happen to be claiming a patent for the same invention.  This happens occasionally and when it does, the patent office starts a "patent interference."  A patent interference is an administrative proceeding pursuant to title 35 of the United States Code, sections 102(g) and 135(a), conducted for the purpose of determining which of competing applicants is the first inventor of common subject matter.  This proceeding is when an inventor's notebook, detailing the timing and scope of his invention, comes in handy.

patent%20attorney%20star Best Practice for Proving Conception.  When an inventor is involved in research, it is a good practice to keep a contemporaneous notebook of research and conclusions.  A bound notebook is best for proving conception because its pages are fixed and tampering would be evident.  The notebook should be continuous, that is, any blank portion of the pages of the bound notebook, which are not written upon, should be marked or lined-thru to show continuity and a consistent effort to foreclose any potential for later alteration of your notebook. 

patent%20attorney%20star Contemporaneous.  A notebook's entries should be made as information (computations, sketches, diagrams, test equipment used and test results) is gathered.  It is recommended that notations in the notebook be made each day research is done, so that a complete and convincingly accurate record of the research activities is made almost at the same time as any invention emerges.   This practice will help to establish priority dates and adequately describe the invention.

patent%20attorney%20star Nature of the Notebook.  A notebook should be treated somewhat like a diary, but should have formalities that lend themselves to proving to a third party what was done and when.  The notebook should be stored in a secure location when not in use, so that when offered as proof, it cannot be claimed that others could have tampered with the entries.

patent%20attorney%20star Entries Made in Ink.  Legibly enter your notations in ink. Do not erase any mistakes.  When correction is necessary, cross out the errors with a single line, then date and initial the changes.  You should sign and date each page below the entered data.  If there is more than one inventor, all should sign.

patent%20attorney%20star Abstract Heading for Chapters.  As an organizational theme, it would help to set out with a chapter heading for each series of pages relating to a specific research objective.  This theme is a short and generic statement of problem and the work that is to be performed and described in the pages to follow.  Keep it factual and avoid trying to describe what results are expected.  Gratuitous conclusions are neither helpful nor necessary and generally detract from the scientific credibility of the notebook.

patent%20attorney%20star Describe the Scope of the Experimental Results.  Explain in detail the work performed and start a new page for each new experiment.  As with most scientific research, you should record your observations of physical results, even if they are not fully appreciated or understood at that time.  This also adds to objectivity and believability.  Experimental results that demonstrate the practice of an invention should contain a paragraph describing the various potential embodiments of the invention with the applicable variables and the reasons the results are expected to be relevant.  Title the paragraph "Modifications and Extensions."  It is not necessary to include complete data as such will probably be unavailable.  Such a paragraph may help provide a valid basis for a generic and species patent claims. 

patent%20attorney%20star Witness your Entries.  Have someone, who is not a possible inventor, sign and date after the last line of each entry.  Two witnesses are even better.  The witness signature does not have to be at the bottom of every page, but should be on every page where a new invention is noted.  The signature of the witness is helpful to prove that you made the entry when you said you did.  Corroboration adds to reliability and believability of the notebook entries.  The witness should be unbiased with respect to ownership of any resulting invention or any research results.  A Notary Public may be used, but is not required.

patent%20attorney%20star Publications.  Do not publish the results of your experimental work until you determine where and when you will be filing for patent protection.   A publication (including abstracts) disclosing patentable inventions can limit or destroy patentability of an invention.  In the United States, one can file a patent application within one year of public disclosure.  However, most foreign countries will not approve an application claiming an invention for anything already described in a publication. See the FAQ page for more discussion of this prohibition.



TRANSLATE THIS PAGE

Home | How to Communicate | Email to: lventre@lventre.com | Useful Links

Client Inventions | Bio | FAQs | Index | Search | Disclaimers

Click Here to Fill-In a Web Form Email

© 2004 Louis Ventre, Jr.

This file last modified 05/23/07.
This page is http://www.lventre.com/notebook.html.