Communication Instructions for Reaching Patent Attorney Ventre

The Law Firm of

Louis Ventre, Jr.

Registered Patent Attorney

DESIGN PATENT DETAILS

Add Site to Favorites

Useful Links from Patent Attorney Ventre
Patent
Applications
1. UTILITY
    -Business Method
    -Software
    -Drug
2. DESIGN
3. PLANT
4. PROVISIONAL
5. PCT
Designing
Around
Patents
Patent
Reexamination
Patent
Reissue
Patent
Infringement
Damages
Patent
Licensing
Foreign Filing
License &
Non-U.S. Filers
 
Invention
Marketing
Invention
Opportunities
Invention
Notebook
Who Is An
Inventor
 
Trademark
Application
Trademark
Cancellation
Trademark
Infringement
International
Trademark
 
Copyright
Application
Copyright Infringement
 
Trade
Secrets
Employment
Secrecy
Agreement
 
Cooperative
R&D
Agreement
 
Pay by
Charge Card
 
Attorney Contact
Information
Attorney
Biography
Proximity to
Patent Office
 
Links
Frequently
Asked
Questions
Tax
Considerations
 
Website Index
Website Use
Disclaimer

A PATENT APPLICATION FOR THE APPEARANCE OF SOMETHING

(Reflects Government Fees effective 19-MAR-2013)

patent%20attorney%20star Design Patent. A design patent is for a new and nonobvious ornamental design for an article of manufacture. This includes a design for an ornament, impression, print, or picture applied to or embodied in an article of manufacture.  It further includes a design for the shape or configuration of an article of manufacture.  However, a picture standing alone is not patentable. A design patent is not permitted for something that exists for purely aesthetic reasons, such as a work of art: An original painting, sculpture, or other work of fine art would be protectable by copyright, but would not be eligible for design patent protection.
  • Do I need a design, utility or plant patent?  See the FAQ that describes "What is Patentable" in each type of patent.

patent%20attorney%20star Protection. A design patent protects only the appearance of an article, and not its structural or functional features. 

DESIGN PATENT APPLICATION REVIEW

patent%20attorney%20star Proceedings. The proceedings relating to granting of design patents are basically the same as those relating to utility patents.

patent%20attorney%20star Drawings.  The value of a design patent is largely dependent upon the skillful preparation of the drawings.  Drawings are normally required to be submitted in black ink on white paper.  Photographs are acceptable only in applications in which the invention is not capable of being illustrated in an ink drawing or where the invention is shown more clearly in a photograph.  Color photographs or drawings are also not permitted unless there is a good reason, a petition and additional fee is filed and the petition is granted.  When it is urgent to get a filing date, color photographs/drawings can be submitted, but these will be considered by the Patent Office to be informal drawings and will have to be replaced by amendment to the application.

DESIGN PATENT APPLICATION COSTS

patent%20attorney%20star Costs. A small entity should expect a design patent application to cost about $1,500 through filing.  The $1,500 includes attorney fees of $1,120 and estimated filing costs for a small entity of $380 ($190 for a micro-entity.

A large entity should expect a design patent application to cost about $2,360 through filing. This includes attorney fees of $1,500 and estimated filing costs for a large entity of $760.

United States Patent and Trademark patent issuance fees for a design patent add about $760, including $510 governement fees and $250 attorney fee) for a small entity ($255 government fee for a micro-entity and $1,020 government fee for a large entity).  There is no publication fee for a design patent.  Also, no fees are necessary to maintain a design patent in force.  United States Patent and Trademark Office filing charges may vary.

(According to the American International Property Law Association Economic Survey of 2013, the typical attorney fees in 2012 for preparation of a design patent application are $1,500.)

patent%20attorney%20star Services After Filing. Attorney fees for a small entity after filing are charged at the rate of $175 per hour. The Law Firm's large entity hourly fee is $250 per hour. Patent prosecution activities after filing are similar to a utility application, but are usually much less complex. If the Patent Office examination leads to a determination that an applicant is entitled to a design patent under the law, a notice of allowance is sent to the applicant’s attorney, calling for the payment of the issue fee.  Attorney fees for filing the allowance papers are $250.

Typical small entity costs through patent issuance are about $2,500 and for a large entity about $3,500.

DESIGN PATENT LIFETIME

patent%20attorney%20star Patent Lifetime. A design patent has a term of 14 years from grant. Effective for patents issued on or after 19-DEC-2013, the design patent term will be 15 years. This increase in patent term is the result of changes made by the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012, discussed below.

DESIGN PATENT APPLICATION UNIQUE ASPECTS

patent%20attorney%20star Patent Application Structure. The specification of a design application is short and ordinarily follows a set form. Only one claim is permitted, following a set form. The drawing of the design patent conforms to the same rules as other drawings, but no reference characters are allowed and the drawing should clearly depict the appearance, since the drawing defines the scope of patent protection.

patent%20attorney%20star PCT - Patent Cooperation Treaty? No, not until 19-DEC-2013 when the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 (Pub. Law 112-211) becomes effective.  This law implements the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs (Hague Treaty) and the Patent Law Treaty. (Both treaties were ratified by the Senate on 07-DEC-2007.) Prior to 19-DEC-2013, International design patent applications may not be filed under the treaties. The implementation law to be effective 19-DEC-2013, allows any person who is a U.S. national, or resident, or company with an industrial or commercial establishment in the United States, to file an international design application for international registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (thereby enabling U.S. applicants to file a single application with USPTO instead of separate applications in multiple countries).

patent%20attorney%20star Provisional Applications? No.  One may not file a provisional design patent application.

patent%20attorney%20star Design Applications Published? No.  Design applications are not subject to application publication after 18 months as are utility applications.

PROCEEDING TO A DESIGN PATENT APPLICATION

patent%20attorney%20star How to Proceed. Telephone (703-242-1247) or email Louis Ventre, Jr. with a short description of the design you want in your application. If the Law Firm has no conflicts and agrees to represent you, you will be sent a retainer agreement with additional instructions on what information is needed.  As with utility patents, a preliminary search of U.S. patents and U.S. applications will be done to make a judgment on patentability.  After you receive the preliminary patentability determination, if you then decide not to submit an application, your retainer will be refunded less any cost the Law Firm had to pay the charge card company to process your credit card payment (if any) of the retainer.

INFRINGEMENT OF A DESIGN PATENT

patent%20attorney%20star Design Patent Infringement. To have infringement of a design patent: 
  1. The starting point is the ordinary observer test formulated in the Supreme Court’s decision in Gorham Co. v. White, 81 U.S. 511 (1871). The Court stated that the test of identity of design “must be sameness of appearance, and mere difference of lines in the drawing or sketch . . . or slight variances in configuration . . . will not destroy the substantial identity.” 

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held: "the 'ordinary observer' test should be the sole test for determining whether a design patent has been infringed. Under that test, as this court has sometimes described it, infringement will not be found unless the accused article 'embod[ies] the patented design or any colorable imitation thereof'.”  Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., No. 2006-1562 (Fed. Cir. 9/22/2008) (Fed. Cir., 2008) (citations omitted, emphasis added).

  1. "If the claimed design consists of a combination of old features that creates an appearance deceptively similar to the accused design, even to an observer familiar with similar prior art designs, a finding of infringement would be justified. Otherwise, infringement would not be found." Egyptian Goddess at 20.
  1. On 11-SEP-2013, the Federal Circuit elaborated on the analysis needed to determine whether or not a design is an obvious variation of an existing design when deciding on infringement:
    "When assessing the potential obviousness of a design patent, a finder of fact employs two distinct steps: first, 'one must find a single reference, a something in existence, the design characteristics of which are basically the same as the claimed design'; second, '[o]nce this primary reference is found, other references may be used to modify it to create a design that has the same overall visual appearance as the claimed design.' Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., 101 F.3d 100, 103 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (internal quotations omitted); see also Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 678 F.3d 1314, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

    "Under the first step, a court must both '(1) discern the correct visual impression created by the patented design as a whole; and (2) determine whether there is a single reference that creates ‘basically the same’ visual impression.' Durling, 101 F.3d at 103. The ultimate inquiry in an obviousness analysis is “whether the claimed design would have been obvious to a designer of ordinary skill who designs articles of the type involved.” Id., quoted in Apple, 678 F.3d at 1329. High Point Design v. Buyer’s Direct (Case No. 2012-1455), Slip opinion, p.12.
    The Federal Circuit also clarified that the "ordinary observer" is the rather un-ordinary skilled designer familiar with the articles involved:
    "The ultimate inquiry in an obviousness analysis is “whether the claimed design would have been obvious to a designer of ordinary skill who designs articles of the type involved.” Slip opinion, p.12 (citations omitted).
    It certainly looks as though the Federal Circuit has created two different tests for obviousness, one (ordinary observer) for deciding whether a design is patentable, and another (ordinary skilled designer) when deciding on whether or not there is infringement of a patented design.

MORE INFORMATION ON PATENT APPLICATIONS

patent%20attorney%20star More Answers on Patents. A vessel hull design may also be registered under a copyright law as explained on the Law Firm's copyright page.  See the FAQ page for more questions answered on patents, the plant patent page for information on plant patents, and the Utility Patent Details page for general patenting details.



Home | How to Communicate | Email to: lventre@lventre.com | Useful Links

Client Inventions | Bio | FAQs | Disclaimers

Search


Click Here to Fill-In a Web Form Email

© 2004 Louis Ventre, Jr.

This file last modified 10/23/15.
This page is http://www.lventre.com/detailsdesign.html.

Click here to report a page error.